There is almost no topic in North America that stirs up more controversy than
abortion. The pro-life movement has gathered supporters and enemies
both in the church and outside of the church. Gallup polls indicate %55 of Americans hold a very strong opinion, one way or the
other, on the issue.1
It is the responsibility of the church to preach truth and to be a
voice for the oppressed. Many pro-life organizations have distributed
and displayed graphic and offensive propaganda in an attempt to raise
awareness on the issue. This pro-life promotion has received angry
and negative responses from the public.
Over the next few days, I will be releasing a series of posts examining the ethical way to promote the pro-life movement. This series is
written on the assumption that abortion is ethically wrong and
contrary to God's Will – it will not address the abortion debate. We will examine why there is such anger towards pro-lifers, whether
scare tactics and shocking pictures are the ethical way to promote a
cause, how the church can ethically promote the
pro-life cause, and if this is a distraction from the Great
Commission.
To Start Off - How the
Pro-Life movement is being perceived
A sampling of Pro-Choice propoganda |
Responses to anti-abortion protests range cynical to offensive. He is a sample of the tamer backlash directed at the church. |
The pro-life
campaign has upset even some who are against abortion. In September
2013, CBC ran a news article about a woman in Hamilton, Ontario, who
was left fuming after a citywide distribution of anti-abortion
pamphlets. Pamphlets were delivered to her door containing pictures
of mutilated fetuses, and these graphic images were only a part of
the citywide campaign.
Banners hung on highways, and trucks drove around sporting similar
images. The article reads:
“'A
child shouldn’t have to see pictures like that,' Cabral told CBC
Hamilton. 'If I want to discuss that with my daughter I will –
when it’s time.' Cabral says that she thinks many of the group’s
methods – like demonstrating outside Hamilton schools – are just
wrong.
'And
I don’t believe in abortion,' she said. 'But I don’t think that
has anything to do with it.
I
know that a gun kills people, but you don’t have to fire a bullet
at me for me to know that.'”6
And
this woman isn't the only one – news articles from all over the
country detail the shock and outrage of people receiving pro-life
propaganda at their doorstep.7
Many people are offended by the pro-life campaigns, and specifically
the graphic images they spread. The comments on these online news
article reveal the a response from the public filled with the same
hatred and anger towards pro-lifers that the social media websites
revealed.8
People everywhere are outraged by the public display of pro-life
propaganda. Whether in anger against intolerance, or anger against
receiving pictures of dead babies at their door, many people, both
pro-choice and pro-life feel that pro-life propaganda is wrong. This
casts a dark light on the pro-life cause.
1Alcorn
(2004), p. 16. Why
Pro-Life? Caring for the Unborn and Their Mothers.USA,
EPM Publishing, 2004.
2Randy
Prine (2013), Tweet.
3The
Daily Edge (2013), Tweet.
4Mrs.
V. (2013), Tweet.
5Fuzzy
Atheist (2013), Tweet.
6Carter
(2013), on-line document. Anti-Abortion
campaign has Hamilton mother fuming. September
27, 2013. Available from:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/news/anti-abortion-campaign- has-hamilton-mother-fuming-1.1870622
(accessed November 18, 2013).
7Woodward
(2013), on-line document. “CTV
British Columbia.” Anti-abortion
postcard campaign over the edge? November
16, 2013. Available from:
http://bc.ctvnews.ca/anti-abortion-postcard-campaign-over-the-edge- 1.1546766
(accessed November 19, 2013).
8Carter
(2013), on-line document. (see 6)
No comments:
Post a Comment